Dismissal for Business Reasons During the Probationary Period: A Critical Review of Slovenian Supreme Court Judgment VIII Ips 28/2025

Introduction On 24 March 2026, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia delivered judgment VIII Ips 28/2025, holding that an employer may not lawfully terminate an employment contract for business reasons (poslovni razlog) while the employee is still serving a probationary period. The ruling provides much-needed clarity for an issue that had previously been interpreted inconsistently — but it also raises important systemic and practical questions for both employers and employees operating under Slovenian labour law. In our daily practice as a Slovenian employment law firm based in Ljubljana,...

Read more...

Can Americans Buy Property in Slovenia and Move There? A Practical Guide on Slovenian Real Estate for U.S. Citizens

For many American clients, Slovenia is attractive for the same reasons: safety, quality of life, access to the Schengen area, strong infrastructure, and a real estate market that is still more accessible than in many parts of Western Europe. A common first question is whether a U.S. citizen may legally buy property in Slovenia at all. The answer is yes. Under Slovenian law and Slovenia’s OECD treaty framework, U.S. citizens may acquire ownership of real estate in Slovenia under the...

Read more...

Lifetime Support Contract in Slovenia: what anyone looking for a lawyer in Slovenia should know

Introduction A lifetime support contract is a well-known legal arrangement in Slovenia when one person agrees to provide care, assistance, and support during another person’s lifetime, while the other party undertakes that certain assets will pass after death. For anyone searching for a lawyer in Slovenia, it is important to understand that this is not merely a private family arrangement. It is a legally complex contractual relationship that can raise serious issues concerning validity, inheritance, obligations, and later disputes. The attached material shows...

Read more...

Pharmacists’ conscientious objection in Slovenia: what every patient their lawyer should know

Introduction: lawyer explains why this case matters in Slovenia In February 2026, the Constitutional Court of Slovenia decided an important case for pharmacies, patients and the wider healthcare system. The Court reviewed whether the law may expressly prevent pharmacy professionals who dispense medicines and health-support products within pharmacy services from invoking conscientious objection. The Court held that this regulation is not inconsistent with the Constitution. For patients, pharmacies and any lawyer following healthcare regulation in Slovenia, this is a decision...

Read more...

Archives, Citizenship, and Descent: The Truth About Slovenian Citizenship by Ancestry

Understanding Archives, Citizenship, and Descent in Slovenia At our law firm, we frequently receive questions about Slovenian citizenship requirements for individuals with Slovene ancestors. Many are drawn to the idea of reclaiming their heritage through descent, and archival documents play a crucial role in this process. However, the path to citizenship is strictly regulated, and there are increasing reports of scams involving companies that promise citizenship based on fabricated or misrepresented archival records. Understanding the legitimate use of archives, the legal...

Read more...

Constitutional Court Decision U-I-151/24: Key Implications for Corporate Lawyers in Slovenia

The Constitutional Court’s decision of March 20, 2025, in case U-I-151/24 has reshaped shareholder rights in insolvency proceedings, presenting new challenges and opportunities for corporate lawyers in Slovenia. The ruling invalidates provisions of Slovenia’s Financial Operations and Insolvency Proceedings Act (ZFPPIPP) and underscores the constitutional right to legal remedies under Article 25 of the Constitution. This article analyzes the decision’s critical takeaways and their implications for legal practice. Why Corporate Lawyers Should Understand Decision U-I-151/24 The Constitutional Court ruled that Article 234(3)...

Read more...

New Supreme Court Practice on Temporary Injunctions in Swiss Franc Loans

Introduction: Significance of Supreme Court Decision II Ips 10/2025 from April 16, 2025 The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia recently issued a landmark ruling (II Ips 10/2025) clarifying the legal position of debtors who have entered into Swiss Franc loans (CHF), especially regarding the possibility of obtaining temporary injunctions that temporarily suspend the effectiveness of the loan agreement. This protects consumers from financial harm during litigation. The decision provides clear guidance on how to effectively safeguard debtors’ rights when...

Read more...

CJEU Judgment in Case C-607/21: Proving Dependency and the Derived Right of Residence for Parents of EU Citizens (family reunification)

On April 18, 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered a key judgment in Case C-607/21, clarifying the conditions under which a third-country national who is the parent of an EU citizen may enjoy a derived right of residence (family reunification) in an EU Member State. The ruling provides essential guidance on the timing of evidence proving dependency and addresses whether unlawful residence under national law affects the right to reside. Factual Background A Moroccan national entered Belgium...

Read more...

The Constitutional Court found the ZFPPIPP unconstitutional regarding the procedural rights of shareholders of a limited liability company in bankruptcy.

With Decision No. U-I-151/24-14 of 20 March 2025, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia reviewed insolvency legislation (ZFPPIPP). It found that the legal provision excluding the possibility for a shareholder of a limited liability company to appeal against the decision initiating bankruptcy proceedings based on the debtor’s proposal is inconsistent with Article 25 of the Constitution. The decision not only expands the procedural rights of shareholders but also reaffirms the importance of the right to legal remedy as a...

Read more...

Advocate General’s Opinion in CJEU Case C-713/23: Member States Must Recognise Same-Sex Marriages Concluded in Other Member States

On 3 April 2025, Advocate General Jean Richard de la Tour of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a significant Opinion in Case C-713/23 – Wojewoda Mazowiecki. The case concerns the right of same-sex couples, married in one EU Member State, to have their marital status recognised in another Member State that does not itself permit same-sex marriage. The Opinion raises key issues regarding the relationship between national laws and EU law in the fields of personal...

Read more...

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close